COP30, Brazilian Agribusiness and Global Supply Chains: Risks, Opportunities and Europe’s Perspective
How COP30 reshaped the global view of Brazil’s agribusiness, climate strategy and its role in the green economy
Editor’s Note
COP30 placed Brazilian agribusiness under an unusually sharp global lens. This publication brings together two complementary perspectives on what that exposure really means.
The first article, written by Fabrício Peres, analyzes how Europe, investors, and global buyers interpreted Brazil’s performance, with a focus on supply chains, regulatory risk, governance, and long-term market access. It reflects an international, risk-based reading of COP30 and its implications for companies sourcing from Brazil.
The second article offers a guest perspective by Bruna Forte, grounded in the national, economic, and geopolitical context. Her analysis explores how Brazil positioned its agribusiness domestically, the opportunities emerging from the green economy, and the structural challenges that remain.
Read together, these two perspectives show why COP30 was not just a climate conference for Brazil, but a strategic inflection point for agribusiness, capital, and global credibility.
COP30: How Europe Read Brazil and What It Means for Global Supply Chains
By Fabrício Peres
COP30: How Europe Read Brazil and What It Means for Global Supply Chains
COP30 reinforced a signal Europe had already been sending: there has been real progress on adaptation and forest mechanisms, but the world remains far from the pace required to mitigate emissions. For companies that depend on Brazilian supply chains, this has direct implications for regulatory risk, cost of capital, and market access.
In practice, the conference placed Brazil in a paradoxical position. The country emerged as a protagonist in climate solutions while remaining one of the largest sources of land-use risk. This was how European governments, analysts, and outlets such as Reuters, Financial Times, and Carbon Brief interpreted the event: progress, yes, but insufficient to sustain full long-term confidence. Given Brazil’s recurring political uncertainty, this reading is hardly surprising.
From Field to Market: Why COP30 Brazil Could Redefine Agriculture’s Role in the Climate Agenda
Beyond Harvest is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
1. What Europe Saw at COP30
1.1. Recognized Advances
Adaptation finance
The decision to triple global adaptation finance by 2035 was viewed as a concrete gain. For Europe, this improves predictability for tropical countries, where global agricultural supply chains face the highest climate risks.
Forests and the Tropical Forests Forever Facility (TFFF)
The forest mechanism announced drew attention for linking forest conservation payments with governance focused on local communities. Euronews, Reuters, and WRI highlighted three elements: a 0.5 percent annual deforestation cap, a minimum of 20 percent of resources allocated to Indigenous peoples and traditional communities, and an initial one-billion-dollar contribution to anchor the model.
For European stakeholders, TFFF is among the first instruments to effectively combine scale, governance, and financial viability.
Constructive diplomacy
Reports from WRI, CSIS, and Carbon Brief acknowledged that the host country worked consistently to build consensus on forests, adaptation, and finance, even without equivalent advances on mitigation.
1.2. Limitations Identified by Europe
The final text lacked a robust timeline for fossil fuel phase-out, frustrating EU expectations.
Reuters and Carbon Brief emphasized that, despite new announcements, the world remains off track for the 1.5°C goal.
European think tanks also noted that agriculture, land use, and mitigation are still treated in an insufficiently integrated way. For analysts who see climate as a system, this remains a central flaw. While agriculture gained more visibility than in past conferences, it is still handled as a parallel agenda rather than a core pillar.
2. How Europe Interpreted Brazil’s Performance
Europe’s reading is less political and more institutional. What matters is coherence between public policy, real data, and governance capacity.
2.1. Recognized Strengths
Consistent deforestation reduction
Reuters reported a significant decline in deforestation in the Amazon and Cerrado between 2023 and 2025. For European markets, consistent numbers matter more than rhetoric and reinforce the perception of regained control and enforcement.
Centrality in forest solutions
Brazil’s leadership in the TFFF consolidated its role as an indispensable actor in carbon and tropical forests. The European Union classified the country as a strategic partner, a rare designation in environmental matters.
Integration of agriculture, forests, and adaptation
The RAIZ initiative was interpreted as a concrete step toward aligning agricultural productivity with restoration. This matters for European supply chains that rely on Brazil and are increasingly prioritizing land-use efficiency.
The Invisible Cost of a Weak Reputation in Agribusiness
Brazilian agribusiness invests billions in productivity, technology, and export capacity.
2.2. Highlighted Fragilities
Structural volatility
While the drop in deforestation is positive, analysts note that Brazil still leads in absolute tropical forest loss. The risk of reversal remains high, and investors are well aware of it.
The Cerrado as a critical zone
Studies cited by European media show that native vegetation conversion in the Cerrado is already undermining agricultural productivity, including soy. Analysis by Zero Carbon Analytics, reported by Reuters, points to potential losses of 9.4 billion dollars in soy production between 2013 and 2023 due to climate regime changes driven by vegetation loss.
Additional reports indicate that roughly half of the Cerrado has already been converted, altering rainfall and drought patterns with direct impacts on yields. This is where environmental risk becomes business risk.
Beef traceability
Difficulties in monitoring indirect suppliers remain one of the most sensitive issues. From a European perspective, this directly affects regulatory risk assessments, especially in light of the EUDR.
How Food Supply Chains Can Achieve EUDR Compliance
Beyond Harvest is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
3. How Brazilian Agribusiness Was Perceived After COP30
Europe’s assessment is technical. Three narratives stand out.
3.1. An indispensable asset with elevated risk
Europe’s dependence on Brazil for soy, beef, coffee, corn, and orange juice is clear, but it comes with caution. The postponement of the EUDR, reported by Reuters, reveals a fragmented landscape: Brazilian exporters have advanced in preparation, European importers have not fully harmonized systems, and regulatory uncertainty raises compliance costs.
3.2. Growing expectations for real governance
The dominant message is straightforward. Brazil has shown it can reduce deforestation, but Europe wants to see continuity anchored in robust governance and verifiable traceability. This lens is applied directly to soy, beef, and coffee.
3.3. Agribusiness as a climate innovation vector
The positive reception of the RAIZ initiative, integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems, and low-emission solutions signals a turning point. Brazilian agribusiness is increasingly seen as a potential climate innovation corridor in restoration, carbon, and land-use efficiency.
In several technical assessments, Brazil appears simultaneously as the world’s greatest challenge and its greatest opportunity at the food, climate, and forests nexus.
Brazil is an Agricultural Powerhouse. But It Sells Like an Amateur.
In a world where differentiation, narrative, and perceived value define success, that mindset is costly.
4. The European Synthesis After COP30 and What It Means for Brazilian Companies
Europe’s balance can be summarized in four points:
COP30 delivered practical advances in adaptation and forest systems.
Global mitigation remains insufficient, increasing pressure on land-use-intensive countries.
Brazil expanded its credibility through deforestation reduction and leadership in forest mechanisms.
Brazilian agribusiness remains at the center of Europe’s radar and may either capture reputation and investment or amplify risk depending on progress in traceability, regulatory compliance, and territorial governance.
For companies exporting to Europe, the debate is no longer about reducing deforestation. The central issue is proving the ability to sustain that reduction over time through consistent governance, verifiable traceability, and regulatory alignment.
Those who structure this first are likely to secure stable market access, reputational advantage, lower compliance costs, and increasingly, access to cheaper capital.
The transition that will define Brazil’s positioning in the coming years is simple: moving from isolated performance to institutional permanence.
Developments from COP30: Brazilian Agribusiness at the Center of the Green Economy
Guest Perspective
By Bruna Forte — Guest Perspective
Dear producer,
This article on COP30 comes directly from our analyses in forums and debates held before and after the event in Belém. The goal is to show how global problems and challenges can turn into major opportunities for the sector. Brazil has everything it needs to lead a positive green economy, with agribusiness at the heart of sustainable innovation.
To provide a full 360-degree view, this piece brings together Bruna Forte’s national and geopolitical perspective and Fabrício Peres’ international and strategic lens.
Brazilian Agribusiness Showing Its Strength at COP30
Brazilian agribusiness delivered a notable performance at COP30. Innovations were presented that go far beyond the farm gate, integrating the entire value chain to promote a positive and profitable socio-environmental transition aligned with the principles of the Positive Green Economy.
Roberto Rodrigues, former Minister of Agriculture, acted as the sector’s special envoy and main interlocutor at COP30. This was a sound decision that consolidated him as the unified voice of Brazilian agribusiness.
A traditional vulnerability, communication, is starting to be overcome. Agribusiness expressed itself clearly and stood out in an ideologically charged and challenging environment. The AgriZone space was among the most visited, featuring presentations on Brazil’s agricultural achievements and the release of strategic documents, including Embrapa’s contributions to the global climate effort and updated land-use studies.
Opening the Gates to a Trillion-Dollar Global Market
Within the economic pillar of the positive green economy, COP30 reinforced Brazil’s potential to capture value from low-carbon transitions. An energy matrix that is 89 percent renewable, combined with agricultural productivity twice that of the U.S. in soy, creates an unmatched competitive advantage.
The real leap comes from integrated value chains. The RAIZ program aims to restore degraded agricultural land and mobilize billions in climate-resilient agriculture investments, supporting the goal of tripling adaptation finance by 2035.
Brazilian agtech innovation also stood out, with autonomous, solar-powered solutions demonstrating the country’s capacity to export high-value technology.
Bioenergy was another highlight. Brazilian ethanol, with efficiency gains across its lifecycle, received attention within FAO discussions on sustainable agrifood systems. With advances in the green hydrogen framework, Brazil could scale production, decarbonize industry, and generate millions of jobs. Green steel produced with planted forest charcoal further completes this cycle.
Projections point to 1.4 trillion reais in additional revenues by 2030 and three million green jobs, not through charity, but through strategy that turns emissions into assets.
Carbon Geopolitics and the BRICS Axis
Geopolitically, COP30 positioned Brazil as a key player in a divided world. With U.S. absence, China and Brazil filled the vacuum, particularly through leadership in carbon market coalitions. The global carbon credit gap is massive, and Brazil has the potential to convert this into significant export value, provided its emissions system is fully regulated.
A potential BRICS 2.0 carbon alliance could emerge, with Brazil supplying removals, Russia acting as a transition fuel provider, China delivering green manufacturing, and India driving demand. This could reshape a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars, depending on geopolitical developments over the next two years.
Green Sovereignty and Invisible Threats
COP30 exposed Brazil’s vulnerabilities, particularly in sanitation, public services, and territorial governance. Climate insurance, illegal deforestation driven by organized crime, and the need for transparent forest funds were central themes.
The conference also highlighted the importance of agro-industrialization, payment for environmental services, and the strategic role of rare earth minerals. Brazil’s development path, including energy choices and resource exploration, must balance sovereignty, social progress, and environmental responsibility.
Final Message to Producers
Predictability is no longer tied solely to production. It is embedded in economic and geopolitical pillars that must now be part of risk analysis. Tools such as rural insurance, operational efficiency, environmental asset monetization, and diversification are no longer optional.
The challenge ahead is clear: feeding a global population of 9.7 billion people by 2050 will require a 70 percent increase in food production. COP30 made one thing evident. The world depends on Brazilian agribusiness.
PS: Most regenerative initiatives fail not in the field, but in decision rooms. That’s why I developed a scorecard that helps you identify where your regenerative strategy is structurally fragile: across governance, incentives, scale readiness, and evidence. It’s a practical reality check for leaders accountable for results, not narratives.