Strategic Sustainability: Why Shallow ESG Can Hurt More Than Help

Companies using sustainability as a PR tool risk greenwashing, litigation, and reputational loss. Here’s how to turn ESG from risk to strategic infrastructure.

Introduction: Why Sustainability, AI, and Reputation Are Now Inseparable

After more than two decades leading global sustainability and business strategy across multinationals in the agri-food and innovation sectors, I’ve learned one hard truth:

Sustainability only creates value when it’s embedded in the business, not marketed around it.

I’ve helped Syngenta and other companies integrate sustainability into R&D pipelines, product portfolios, governance systems, and go-to-market strategies. I’ve seen ESG drive $1B in new revenue and protect billions more by securing a company’s social and commercial license to operate.

But most companies are still far from this reality.

In today’s hyper-transparent economy, trust is infrastructure. It drives capital access, customer loyalty, talent retention, and license to grow. For global companies operating in sensitive or regulated value chains, from agriculture to consumer goods, sustainability is one of the core filters in how the world decides who to do business with.

Yet many still treat it as a side initiative.

It lives in reports, dashboards, or brand campaigns, disconnected from how decisions are made and value is created. That’s no longer sustainable.

And there’s a new force accelerating this reckoning: AI.

With real-time data synthesis and generative search (e.g. ChatGPT, Perplexity), artificial intelligence is radically increasing the visibility and verifiability of corporate behavior. ESG claims, supply chain risks, environmental violations, what used to be buried in audits now surfaces in seconds.

In this environment, reputation becomes algorithmic.

Buyers, investors, and civil society use AI to scan, compare, and rank companies by their sustainability posture. And unlike brand storytelling, these systems reward substance, not spin.

So where does that leave your business?

The answer isn’t another sustainability campaign.

It’s a shift in architecture: one where sustainability is embedded in how your company operates, competes, and grows.

That’s the foundation of the Strategic Sustainability Framework, a model designed to help business leaders transform ESG from external pressure into internal advantage.

1. The ESG Illusion and the Hidden Cost of Shallow Sustainability

“Sustainability” has never been more visible in corporate language. ESG targets headline investor updates, board presentations, and brand communications. But in many organizations, sustainability remains a surface-level effort. It is framed as a narrative to please stakeholders, rather than a driver of business decisions.

That approach is not just ineffective. It is strategically dangerous.

When sustainability is treated as a PR asset instead of a core business function, three critical risks emerge:

• Reputational risk. Customers and civil society are increasingly able to detect gaps between what companies say and what they do. Greenwashing accusations spread fast. Trust, once lost, is expensive to recover.

• Legal and compliance risk. ESG-related litigation is rising. In industries like agriculture, chemicals, food, and cosmetics, inconsistent sustainability claims or lack of stewardship protocols can open the door to lawsuits and regulatory investigation.

• Market access risk. Buyers, distributors, and public procurement channels now demand verifiable sustainability performance. Weak ESG posture can disqualify companies from high-value contracts and premium markets.

This landscape is no longer just monitored by humans. It is being scanned, summarized, and surfaced by AI. With the rise of real-time data synthesis and semantic search, artificial intelligence is making ESG visibility radically more accessible. Supply chain risks, environmental violations, and gaps in sustainability claims are exposed instantly. A company’s reputation is now shaped not only by headlines, but by algorithms.

This is the age of algorithmic trust.

Inconsistent ESG behavior is no longer hidden in reports. It becomes searchable. Comparable. Actionable. The implication is clear: shallow ESG strategies erode value. They drain internal resources while increasing exposure. They fail to generate differentiation and often create skepticism among the very stakeholders they aim to reassure.

The alternative is not more messaging. It is more integration.

Sustainability must be reframed from collateral to infrastructure. From PR to performance. From compliance to strategy.

This is the starting point of the Strategic Sustainability Framework, a system built to embed ESG into the architecture of how companies operate, compete, and grow.

The Strategic Operating System: Six Levers, One Architecture

Sustainability becomes truly strategic when it stops being a reporting silo and starts functioning as an operating system — integrated into how the company makes decisions, designs value, and earns trust.

The Strategic Sustainability Framework is built on six interconnected but distinct levers, structured in three executive blocks. Together, they transform ESG from pressure to performance.

I. Strategic Architecture

This is the foundation. It determines how priorities are defined, who owns them, and how they influence people and decision-making structures.

1. Governance and Accountability

Sustainability must be built into governance, not reviewed after the fact. That means embedding ESG into board oversight, strategic planning, risk frameworks, and capital allocation processes.

Leading companies translate ESG goals into executive KPIs and tie them to performance reviews, investment decisions, and long-term incentive plans. Sustainability is not delegated. It is owned at the top.

2. People and Culture

Purpose attracts talent. Culture sustains it.

In high-performing organizations, sustainability is part of the employee value proposition. It informs how teams are trained, how success is defined, and how cross-functional ownership is built.

This is not employer branding. It is capability building, creating a workforce aligned with long-term strategic values.

II. Value Across the Lifecycle

This block focuses on how sustainability is embedded into what the company creates, how it delivers, and how it mitigates impact across the value chain.

3. Product Innovation and Stewardship

Sustainability begins at the design stage. It means creating products and services that perform across the full lifecycle, from raw materials to use-phase and end-of-life.

Companies leading in this space invest in circular design, customer education, and reverse logistics. In crop protection, for example, product stewardship includes farmer training, return programs, and post-market monitoring. The goal is shared responsibility, not just reduced footprint.

This creates differentiation that is not only regulatory-proof but value-generating.

4. Operations and Supply Chain

From emissions and energy to water, waste, and soil health, operations are where ESG becomes visible.

But impact doesn’t stop at the factory gate. Scope 3 emissions, deforestation exposure, labor risks, and traceability are all now part of supplier selection, procurement models, and risk profiles.

Strategic sustainability requires operational rigor. It demands visibility, accountability, and upstream engagement across the value chain.

III. Market Access and Positioning

This block captures how sustainability influences go-to-market strategies, brand value, and the right to grow.

5. Market Activation and Brand Architecture

Premium positioning depends on credibility. Leading companies activate sustainability not through storytelling, but through verifiable performance linked to commercial offers.

That includes bundling sustainable innovation with services, advisory, or ecosystem value. Take the Reverte program in Brazil: soil regeneration combined with technical assistance and product solutions (agronomic and financial), unlocking over $1 billion in projected revenue.

Sustainability becomes the differentiator, not decoration.

6. Market Access and Societal License

Your license to operate is not only regulatory. It is relational.

It depends on the trust of stakeholders, from local communities to international buyers. Companies that integrate societal expectations, transparent engagement, and strategic coalitions build a competitive moat that no certification alone can offer.

This is especially critical in high-risk geographies or sensitive sectors, where perception, legitimacy, and alignment with local priorities shape long-term viability.

These six levers are not optional. They are interconnected pillars of a coherent sustainability architecture.

When aligned, they create trust at every level: with investors, employees, customers, partners, and society. And that trust compounds, unlocking access, accelerating growth, and future-proofing the business model.

Strategic Sustainability in Action: Architecture, Lifecycle, and Market Impact

The true strength of a strategic framework lies in its ability to adapt to real business challenges. The Strategic Sustainability Framework has been tested in diverse contexts, from corporate governance and product development to market-facing differentiation. Below are three cases illustrating how each pillar of the system creates measurable impact.

Strategic Architecture: Turning ESG into Business Governance

At Syngenta, one of the most significant transformations began at the top. Through the implementation of the Portfolio Sustainability Assessment (PSA), the company embedded ESG criteria directly into its R&D pipeline and product portfolio governance. Unlike traditional CSR tools, the PSA became a formal gatekeeper in investment decisions, linking sustainability performance to commercial viability.

This approach made ESG tangible to business units. Products were scored and classified based on their sustainability contribution, influencing not only development priorities but also resource allocation and long-term market strategy. Importantly, PSA metrics were integrated with commercial KPIs, including sales and portfolio growth.

The result: sustainability stopped being a side narrative and became a decision filter for innovation, risk exposure, and growth. It enabled strategic clarity and positioned Syngenta to lead the industry in aligning environmental impact with financial performance.

Value Across the Lifecycle: Stewardship as a Strategic Design Lever

In sustainability, what happens after the sale is just as critical as what comes before. Products alone don’t drive outcomes, systems do. That’s why stewardship needs to be designed, not assumed.

As Syngenta’s global representative on the steering committee of CropLife International’s Sustainable Pesticide Management Framework (SPMF), I had the opportunity to help shape one of the most ambitious industry-wide efforts to embed lifecycle sustainability into crop protection.

Rather than focusing only on reformulating products or publishing commitments, the SPMF takes a systemic view. It integrates safe-use protocols, farmer training, disposal and waste management, and post-market monitoring into a global framework of responsibility. The goal: ensure that sustainability is delivered in the field, where it matters most.

Our work involved aligning multinational companies, regulatory expectations, and regional realities to define a standard that was both credible and implementable. More than a technical guide, the SPMF became a tool for market access, risk mitigation, and value chain trust.

This experience underscored a critical lesson: sustainability doesn’t end with compliance. It lives in how your company enables responsible use and how that shapes long-term impact, legitimacy, and differentiation.

Market Access and Positioning: Product Differentiation through ESG Performance

Sustainability is no longer just a reputational concern. It is increasingly a competitive lever in market access and portfolio positioning. Syngenta’s recent launch of two differentiated crop protection products illustrates how ESG features can directly enhance go-to-market strategy.

The first, a nematicide with strong soil health benefits, was positioned not only for efficacy but for its regenerative impact on soil biological activities. The second, based on the active ingredient metproxybicyclone, was designed with a “safer by design” profile, featuring favorable toxicological and environmental properties.

Both products were launched with sustainability performance as a core value proposition — enabling price differentiation, market segmentation, and enhanced buyer confidence, especially in regions with tight regulatory or reputational pressures.

This is where strategic sustainability becomes visible to the market. When products carry embedded ESG value, not as a label but as a verifiable performance trait, they build commercial advantage. Sustainability, in this case, is not a campaign. It is a route to premium.

From Patchwork ESG to Strategic Infrastructure

As sustainability pressures grow, most companies find themselves in a familiar dilemma: their ESG commitments are expanding, but their strategic clarity isn’t.

They launch initiatives, publish reports, and respond to stakeholder expectations, yet the impact remains fragmented. Compliance improves. Messaging becomes more sophisticated. But the business does not fundamentally change.

The reason is simple. Sustainability remains a layer, not a structure.

What’s missing is integration, a unifying architecture that connects sustainability to how the company governs, innovates, operates, engages, and grows. Without this structure, ESG efforts may satisfy today’s visibility needs, but they rarely deliver long-term advantage.

By contrast, companies that treat sustainability as strategic infrastructure, not just as an external narrative, build something more powerful: resilience. They unlock access to premium markets, de-risk their portfolio, attract talent, strengthen their brand, and earn legitimacy in the eyes of both society and regulators.

In an economy where AI-driven transparency and stakeholder scrutiny define corporate trust, this integration becomes not just important, but essential.

Strategic sustainability is no longer a function. It is a system, one that sits inside the business model, not beside it.

The companies that lead this shift won’t be the ones with the most polished ESG report. They will be the ones whose business architecture reflects clarity, coherence, and purpose, at every level.

Let’s Keep This Strategic

If you’re a business leader navigating ESG complexity, market exposure, or value chain risk — and you see sustainability not as a communication tool but as a growth enabler — you’re not alone.

I write for decision-makers like you.

Subscribe to Beyond Harvest, my executive newsletter on strategy, sustainability, and trust-building in global value chains.
Each edition delivers sharp insights, practical frameworks, and high-trust positioning ideas — designed for companies that want to lead where others follow.